Spring- A reminder

Early on Sunday mornings when I was a child, my father used to wake us up by yelling up the stairs: Time to get up, the sun's shining and the birds are singing. I don't know why, but that phrase always seems to pop into my head in the spring. The days are getting pretty, windows are opened to the world, the yard is starting to look inviting, and it just seems that people get more active.

And every spring, some of the same problems crop up. These may or may not actually be crimes. But they are reminders.

This woman is not named, in order to protect the identity of the baby. But she evidently decided to celebrate spring or something. She went to a casino, and while she was there she left her 5 month old baby in the car. The child was strapped into a car seat, and the windows were down about an inch. The doors were locked, and the child was left alone at least 20 minutes. This woman got lucky. She is facing charges of abandonment and she will be going to court to try to get her child back. But the child is alive.

 http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1144878610417&call_pageid=968350130169&col=969483202845

But every year we lose kids like this. The sun shining down on a metal car, with the windows rolled up- the temperatures can soon become unbearable. Children dehydrate easily, and their little heat fighting mechanisms are not always able to deal with the increasing temperatures in an enclosed car. It doesn't take long for a child to die this way. Don't leave those kids in the car. It is just as dangerous as leaving them in an unheated car in the middle of winter.

The second reminder is this. With the increasing temperatures, we often want to throw those home windows wide, to get the spring breezes and wonderful spring smells into the home. Now kids are curious, we all know that. They are also unfamiliar with the concept of danger. And they love to go outside. So an open window is a major temptation.

A child was taken to the hospital after falling from an upstairs window. The child fell 17 feet to the pavement below. It was conscious and breathing and was taken to the local hospital.

http://www.wcpo.com/news/2006/local/04/14/fall.html

Often we don't think of this as a danger. We know it isn't safe to climb or play there. Kids don't. We think, well there is a screen. But screens aren't designed to hold a child's weight. If you are going to open an upstairs window, make sure there are guards, or that you are there to supervise the child. Keep them away from the window, because it is a danger.

Third, we are all spending more time in the yard. Kids are playing, the lawn mowers come out, the chemicals are being used. And we are out of the habit.

Patrol your yard, checking it for any dangers that may have developed over the winter. Review safety precautions with the kids. Remind them of the dangers of getting too close to the street or of talking to strangers. Remind them not to walk behind vehicles. Review for yourself the dangers of any equipment or chemicals that you may be using. If you have a pool or there is one nearby, review the safety precautions. Check the locks on the gate.

Stay safe this year and keep those kids safe.

He won the argument (But lost the war)

Hubert Anderson, 56, got into an argument Sunday with his ex-wife Delores Anderson, 49. Connie Almond, 45, was Delores's roommate and she was present at the time. At some point Hubert shot Anderson and then turned the gun on the roommate, Almond. He shot at her three times. Delores was killed and Almond was wounded. Then he took off. Almond was treated and released at a hospital.

A manhunt ensued, and they found him at a friend's home. There a standoff occurred. It ended when Hubert fatally shot himself.

http://www.wwaytv3.com/Global/story.asp?S=4753521&nav=menu70_2

http://www.wral.com/news/8581343/detail.html

I understand that arguments can and do occur before, during and after a marriage. And I understand that an argument can often begin an adrenaline rush, triggering the fight or flight instincts. By the time they reach adulthood most people have learned to exercise some control over that instinct. Hubert evidently wanted to win the argument very badly. In shooting Delores, he got the last word. I guess you could say he "won". But winning an argument through violence, starts a war. With forensics, witnesses, police, prosecutors, it is like starting a war that very few people win. Hubert "won". But when faced with what he had done, and with the police at his door, he knew he wasn't going  to win the war. So he decided not to fight. Guess he lost the war, huh?

They need to develop classes on how to argue without violence. They should be mandatory.

Carnival of True Crime Blogs XIX

It is that time of the week again. Trench at The Trenchcoat Chronicles is hosting the Carnival this week. Don't be frightened by his little mascot there, he growls but he doesn't bite.
http://www.thetrenchcoat.com

Grandmother

Callie Edmonds, 72, loved her gardening and the bright colorful flowers she grew. She also loved baking and she loved her friends in the neighborhood, one friend mentioned in the article had been friends more than 50 years. Evidently she also loved her grandson, who resided in her home. Callie Edmonds was found in her home early Mon. morning, dead from stab wounds.

Her grandson Donald Keith Anderson, 24, walked two miles to a local jail on early Monday morning, arriving around 2:50 am and told them what he had done and where they could find his grandmother. No real motive has been given for the crime, but a police captain said that "Apparently he had resentment or anger building up within him over various family matters and she just happened to be the target."

Mrs. Edmonds was found on her living room floor, and allegedly she had been stabbed multiple times with a "kitchen utensil.

http://www.wtvm.com/Global/story.asp?S=4752119&nav=8fap

http://www.ledger-enquirer.com/mld/ledgerenquirer/news/local/14313191.htm

http://www.wtvm.com/Global/story.asp?S=4749940&nav=8fap

I understand that life can give us many frustrations. And that often we return home to release that frustration, venting in a place we feel safe, with loved ones who may or may not have been involved in that frustration. Many an argument has been instigated at home, after a bad day at work or other types of frustrating days. But when it starts escalating, you have to walk away. Take a walk, call a friend, clean the house, mow the lawn do something that will help to release that frustration in a way that will not hurt those you love.

A part of me admires the way Anderson must have been raised. He didn't try to cover up, he didn't try to run. He did what was right by walking to the jail and turning himself in. But how I wish he had taken that walk before the murder of his grandmother. Likely he is now wishing the same thing.

Is this a crime committed within a home?

I will freely admit that this one doesn't quite fit the criteria I set for this blog. But it is really close. And to be brutally honest, I just really felt compelled to write about it.

In Nov. 2004, 37 year old Robert LeClair pled guilty to sexual assault on a minor. Commonly known as statutory rape, he admitted a sexual relationship with a child of 15. It was a crime because she had not reached the age to consent to a sexual relationship at the time of conception. LeClair did not serve any jail time.

As a result of the sexual activity, the 15 year old became pregnant. At the time that LeClair was going to court over the sexual assault, he was already taking steps to gain partial custody of the baby. In Aug. of 2005, the family court denied LeClair any custodial rights to the child. LeClair is taking this to the state Supreme Court trying to  get the ruling changed.

In LeClair's words: "I care deeply about the mother and child," LeClair writes. "… Loving her was no excuse for taking this action instead of waiting for her to be old enough. … There was no force or threats just bad judgment. I know I can't change what's happened but I can change me through treatment and I can be a good father to my son and a responsible person … and take an active role in my child's future."

But there are other ways of looking at this as shown by the attorney representing the mother:

"The whole issue goes to, 'What rights does someone convicted of a crime have to a child conceived as a result of that crime?'" says Michael Blair, the Barre lawyer representing the mother in Supreme Court. "It's an important case and because nothing like it has gone before (the Vermont Supreme Court), there's no real clear picture of the answer."

The family court judge gave his opinion when he denied the custodial rights to the father by saying this:

"It is one thing to confer the duties and obligations of parenthood upon persons who knowingly engage in the risk of fatherhood with adult women who consent to such activity," Eaton wrote. "It is quite another to bestow them upon persons who violate a woman's right to the sanctity of her own body or those who sexually prey upon children lacking the legal, emotional and developmental maturity to consent to sexual activity."
"Our society criminalizes statutory rape for good reason," Eaton wrote. "This court does not endorse the establishment of paternal benefits as a result of conception resulting from a criminal sexual assault, at least where the mother opposes it."

And the court had this to say:

"It is not the brute biological fact of parentage, but the existence of an actual or potential relationship that society recognizes as worthy of respect and parentage," that accords fathers parental rights, the court said. Because of the 27-year age difference, and the fact that the conception occurred because of a statutory rape, the court ruled the father's role in the life of the baby was not worthy of protection by the court.

http://www.rutlandherald.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060409/NEWS/604090358/0/FRONTPAGE

Now let's take a look at this "bad judgement" as LeClair puts it. He committed a criminal act by having sex with an underage child. In committing that crime, he failed to use protection as a result of which the child became pregnant. Pregnant teens are often looked at as "high risk" when they become pregnant, simply because pregnancy at that age can affect their health and the health of the child. Was that a reliable sign of the "love" he felt for the mother and the child?

"In the best interest of the child". That is a legal term which means that whatever action the court takes has to be weighted by what is best for the child. Well, first of all we have two children here, the mother and the child. And what benefit will it do the child to be caught between a young mother, struggling to cope with what happened to her as a child, and the man who caused what happened? Let alone what it might do to the mother. Yes, there may be a financial benefit. But actually, in most states he can be accessed a child support obligation, irregardless of whether he sees the child or not, as child support is a different issue than custody or visitation.

And the child could end up with an education on sex offenders, if LeClair is on the sex offender registry (I have no way of knowing if the Robert LeClair I found on the New Hampshire registry is the same Robert LeClair or not). But if indeed he is on the list, there are sure to be visits from police and parole officers from time to time. And what about as the child grows goes to school, and makes friends? Could LeClair use that to insert himself in the world that children inhabit? Mr. LeCair mentioned treatment. By all means, he should get through and comprehensive treatment. But really, should he then subject himself to a world where he might be tempted to use "bad judgement" again?

Most children benefit from having two parents in their lives. But I would think that allowing LeClair to be a participant to be in this child's life could be pretty risky. And I don't really see where the benefits would outweigh the risks.

And last but not least, just to simplify the matter: If someone steals my purse, uses my money to purchase a lottery ticket, should they then be allowed to keep the lottery winnings?

Honeymoon

Three months ago the nation's attention was captured by the death of a new young wife. Brandi Dunn and Scott Dunn had been married less than a year. They were living in Brandi's parent's home, while the parents were on vacation in Calif. According to this article, the home was still scattered by gifts from the wedding.

They were a young, white, couple and the murder was pretty gruesome. Brandi was killed by trauma from a blunt object and allegedly had glass in her hair at the time of her death. After her death, her body was set on fire. The story spread through the mainstream media and the blogger realm, so the details are pretty well known.

On that Jan. 14 morning Scott Dunn called 911 at 7:32 am and told that he returned to his "girlfriend's in-laws' home", and saw a white, blond male beating her. He claimed that he chased the intruder who ran out the back door, and who through a match into the home causing it to explode.

Since then, there have been multiple stories both to law enforcement officers and neighbors. The basic storyline doesn't change, but the details sure do. And some of the evidence doesn't fit the story or stories.

Brandi had a My Space account and so did Scott. Both personal sites have been gone over thoroughly by both the law enforcement and by persons online. From a comment that Brandi left online, it has been surmised that the couple may have been arguing in the days before the murder. However, police have not given a motive for the murder.

It has been a long three months since the murder. Most people who had read the details of the murder and the subsequent disclosures had already theorized that Scott Dunn was lying about the events that occurred that morning. Despite media scrutiny and pressure from the public police had never named a suspect or given any indications as to what happened on this terrible morning. Now they say they suspected Scott all along. And they say they don't believe that anyone else was involved in the murder.

Scott Dunn was arrested Mon. morning after he turned himself in to the state police. He has been arraigned and charged with criminal homicide, abuse of a corpse and three counts of arson.He is in jail, being held without bail.

http://www.thederrick.com/stories/04112006-2104.shtml

The arrest wasn't really a surprise as most have been theorizing all along that Scott Dunn had killed Brandi. And some of the shock of the murder has worn off, at least for the public. Yet it is still difficult for me. This was a young couple, no children, still on their "honeymoon" playing house in Brandi's parents home. The excitement from the wedding had likely worn off, but they still didn't seem overburdened with responsibility. Yes they had had an argument, but couples often do at that stage in a marriage. With the excitement over, most couples settle down to learning to share with each other and developing the footing that their marriage would be based on.

Yes, there was possibly some pressure from relatives for them to become more independent. Scott at least was working, so likely it was expected they would get a home of their own at some point. And maybe there is a clue in that argument that was illustrated in the comment Brandi left on My Space. But I cannot imagine any argument or anything that Brandi could have done that was so bad that it would call for her death. Certainly in this three months, everything that was known about her has been scrutinized and nothing has been found.

Could Scott have been tired of marriage so soon? Or was he just set on control, that everything had to go his way including his wife's actions and reactions? Scott had just picked Brandi up that morning from a friend's home at 6:14 am. He called 911 at 7:32 am. So there hadn't been time for an extended argument. The why's of the crime will probably never be known. But I have to say that I wonder if Scott now thinks he won the argument or if he feels he has bettered his circumstances.

A contrast

Lisa Radtke, 22 was a senior in college and due to graduate from college in 2 weeks with a degree in urban planning. She lived at home, with her mother Sharon Radtke, 56, and her grandmother Bonita Radtke, 79. Lisa was known in the neighborhood as being active in church, and for her love of music. She is described as a "beautiful young lady, the kind of daughter any mother would want to have." They were described as having a good relationship.

Sharon Radtke was a legal secretary who had recently lost her job. She was worried about losing everything she owned, about losing her house and becoming homeless. Her family had offered to help in this financial crisis and they were going to work things out. Sharon had allegedly been somewhat withdrawn lately.

 On Fri. about 11:50 pm police got a call. A woman told them she had just shot her daughter. Police found Sharon Radtke in her doorway and found Lisa Radtke dead in her bedroom.

Allegedly, Sharon stated the reason she shot her daughter was because she didn't want her daughter to experience being "poor".

http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060410/METRO/604100390/1003

I don't understand. This girl had everything going for her. She was due to graduate from college, she would be beginning to find a job, soon would be supporting herself, and from all indications, would likely have been willing to help her mother. Also, their family was willing to step up and help the family out. I am sure things might have been hard for a while. And I am sure that it would have been difficult to accept help. But everyone experiences tough times. And this girl had her whole life in front of her. She was on her way to a career. A career in which she wouldn't have been "poor". "Poor" is one of those weird words. A billionaire whose income suddenly drops to $50,000 a year might describe themselves as "poor". But a person who lives on $25,000 would describe that as pretty well off. A true homeless person living on the street, might think that $25,000 a year was pretty well off. Radlke said she feared being homeless. But a plan was already taking place to save the home.

Radlke being noted as withdrawing into the home makes me wonder if she wasn't suffering from depression. And I also wonder about the contrasts here. A daughter whose life was just beginning and a mother who may have thought her life (or her life as she had become accustomed to) was ending.

I also wonder if the mother considered the fact that she killed her daughter over an ideal. She may have thought she was saving her daughter from being "poor". But instead, she left her daughter, at least briefly with the pain of a gunshot and the knowledge that her mother killed her.

What the evidence shows

Louis T. Stanback Jr., 53, says that his shooting of his stepson was an accident. He allegedly stated to police that he was arguing with his wife of 16 years, and he got a gun to warn her off. Allegedly she grabbed his arm and the gun went off, the bullet striking and killing her 21 year old son Robert Luea.

However, allegedly his  wife disputes this account by saying that she was in another room when  the shooting occurred. A doctor at the emergency room has also told police the gun was touching or nearly touching the stepson's head when the gun went off.

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/6420AP_WA_Stepson_Shooting.html

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/6420AP_WA_Stepson_Shooting.html?source=rss

People who commit crimes will often explain the events in the way that will leave them in the best possible light. One of the ways they do that is by "distancing" themselves from the events. It wasn't "his" fault, his wife grabbed his arm. And sometimes they even believe their own statements, as they are often in a situation where they adrenaline is high, and while adrenaline is great for "fight or flight" it tends to leave some gaps or distortions in the memory.

At one time a situation like this would result in a great defense in a murder trial. It would come down to a he said/she said and be left up to the jury to make a decision as to which one they believed.

However, there has been a lot of studies of forensics. They have gotten good at interpreting the events of a crime scene through studying the evidence available at a crime scene and on a victim and suspect. Fortunately, we no longer have to depend on "he said/she said" so much.  

Grandparents and grandchildren

Two children were at their grandparents. And evidently somehow they got sucked into a horrendous situation. One station is reporting that their mother dropped the kids off at her parents home on Fri. morning where they were expected to get on a school bus, and that she returned to pick them up after work. Other media articles state that the children had spent the night with their grandparents. 14-year-old grandson Deonte and 4-year-old granddaughter DeNyia. They were spending the night with their grandparents Harry L. Shrieves Sr., 68, and his wife, Edna, 58. Their mother went to pick them up and walked into one of those nightmares, that you just think can't be true, you pray is not true. But it is. She found the bodies of her two children, along with their grandparents. During the investigation, police began looking for a relative Ronald Shrieves, 32. How he is related has not been released. Police located him driving the truck of one of the victims. A 6 mile police chase ensued, and he was stopped. He was unarmed at the time of arrest. He is currently being held on traffic charges as the investigation continues. http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=1822305 http://www.forbes.com/home/feeds/ap/2006/04/08/ap2657421.html I am not clear on all of the relationships here. The mother and the grandparents all share the same last name as the suspect. And police have not released the nature of the relationship yet. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Ronald Shrieves, 32 is the son of Harry and Edna Shrieves. He has now been charged with 4 counts of murder. Police are still not releasing any details of the murder or a motive. http://home.hamptonroads.com/stories/story.cfm?story=103333&ran=20306

A lovely lady

There is a lot being said about Sharon Hotchkiss, 47. She was a lovely lady, a hard worker, a great person. Well known and well loved. No she wasn't a city leader, she was a mother, and she held two other jobs, as a waitress and as a certified nurse's aide working with the elderly.
She was found in her apartment, dead possibly from a knife wound.

Police were in touch with her son, Jason Hotchkiss, 21. He told police where to find him, and they have arrested him for the murder of his mother. At the time of his arrest, he was found in possession of his mother's car, a knife and her credit card. There are indications that the two were in a heated argument when the death occurred.

He has been charged with murder, sixth-degree larceny and having a weapon in a motor vehicle.

http://www.connpost.com/news/ci_3687617

http://www.wtnh.com/Global/story.asp?S=4741678&nav=menu29_2

The impact on this community is going to be huge. She was well known and well loved. The statement was made that this woman was the last one they would expect to be murdered. To compound the shock, is the news that her death came at the hands of her son. With two jobs, she came into contact with a lot of people as she went about her daily activities. So her death will touch on many people.

Jason was not thought to be a "bad" kid. Though there was comment from Sharon's ex boyfriend that indicates he may have gotten into "bad stuff". The ex-boyfriend indicated that Sharon did "everything" for Jason. Still a neighbor said he wasn't a "bad" kid.

Somewhere, there are relatives who have just learned of the loss of Sharon. And that the death occurred at the hands of her son. Besides dealing with the grief over losing Sharon, they will have to be dealing with the question of where they stand. Do they stand on the side of the maximum prosecution of the case, or do they stand with their other relative, on punishment but with compassion. Not an easy decision. A decision that can often split a family as each may take different sides.

What happens in a relationship, what goes so very wrong where a loved one can murder another loved one? I don't have the answer in that. Surely, if we knew something could be done to stop the violence in the home.

« Older entries Newer entries »