Disrespect

Said Biyad and his wife Fatuma Amir and their four children came to the US in 2004. They were Somali Bantu’s.  Their country had been torn by violence since 1991. The danger was so great that thousands fled Somali, hoping to escape the danger. In 2003, the United Nations stepped in to assist with the refugee problem. They began locating many refugees hoping to get them into a position where they could survive. Biyad and Amir ended up coming to the US.

When they arrived in Oregon, they set out to do as many of the refugees do. They began learning English, they got jobs, and they began making friends in Portland where they had settled including friends with other refugees who had settled there.

In many countries there are no laws against domestic violence. Considered a family problem, it was up to the extended family and friends to protect the victim and punish the abuser. And they typically do not discuss family issues outside the family. Also due to the violent state of their country, many refugees have had bad experiences with authority figures who often chose sides in the civil war and they retain fear of authority figures when they arrive in the US. Therefore, they arrive in the US, speaking little English, with a fear of authority figures, and  knowing nothing about the US laws and even less about how to go about seeking help or where to ask for it.

In March of 2005, police were called to the home of Said Biyad and Fatuma Amir. In the police report it stated  “Verbal-only argument. After initially leaving, (Amir) drank bleach and was transported by ambulance to the hospital.” It was known within the community that there was a problem with domestic violence in the family. And it was known that Biyad was very jealous, as he had complained of community members being too friendly with his wife. Some of the community were aware of the domestic violence and offered help, but Biyad told them to “stay out of it”.

At some point Fatuma Amir did reach out, requesting help from and Refugee Community Organization, but as so often happens, she withdrew her request.  

Fatuma Amir did leave the home and lived on her own for a time in Portland Oregon. Then one day she was gone. Said Biyad attempted to call his home and received no answer. When he arrived at the home, no one was there and it wasn’t known where they had gone.

No one knew how she managed to transport herself and their children across the country to Kentucky, where Amir’s brother resided. And for a time, no one knew where they had gone. Then one day Biyad announced they had moved to Kentucky and that he was going to join them there. He did not say how he learned of their whereabouts, but he stated that Amir wanted him to come. Biyad sold his car and left for Kentucky.

Biyad was in Kentucky for several weeks with the family. Then one day he walked into the police station and told them he had just killed his family.

Reportedly he raped his wife and bludgeoned her with a hammer several times. Then he used a hunting knife to cut the throats of Goshany, Khadija, Fatuma and Sidi Ali ages ranging from 2 to 8 years of age. He told police he did it because his wife had been “disrespectful”.

Fatuma Amir was alive when police went to the home. She was transported to the hospital, and her condition is not being released per the families request.

Said Biyad has been charged with 4 counts of murder, and 1 count each of attempted murder, domestic rape, and 1st degree assault. The death penalty is a possibility.

courier-journal.com            courier-journal.com

kentucky.com                  oregonlive.com

Many countries do not have the laws to protect women or even children like the US has. And in many countries the man is expected to be the head of the family who makes all of the decisions for the family. I don’t know much about the Somalia culture, but I did pick up on a couple of things that stood out to me. A comment was made by one of the friends that when he had gone to the home, that Amir behaved deferentially. And several mentions was made of offers to help being made to Biyad. This leads me to believe that in that culture the man of the house is indeed the boss. That is not a problem as long as no violence occurs. It works in some cultures, even in some homes where it is not the cultural norm, as long as violence does not occur. If it works and both parties are ok with it,  don’t change it is my feeling.

But if violence enters the relationship, if the man cannot place his family above the vague concept of ‘respect’ and ‘honor’, then persons outside the relationship must step in.

Some may see this as a cultural problem. But it is not. It happens in homes from this type of culture, yes. But it also happens in homes with different cultures.

Women in the US are supposed to be viewed as equals, that is our “cultural norm”. Yet many of the same ideals occur in US households. For example, infidelity is often considered to be worse if it is committed by a woman. The man is often thought of as the head of the household and he is expected to support the household or at least provide the majority of the support. Men are not thought to be abused in US households, or at least shouldn’t admit to it. They should “be a man” and stop it, or they should “be a man and take it”.

The struggle for dominance or equality in a home is a universal problem, not a cultural problem, though how it is handled in various cultures can be different.

And a big Thank You to D.P. for the tip on this one.

What is the ‘Honeymoon Cycle of Abuse’?

Domestic Violence relationships tend to follow somewhat of a pattern, at least in the earlier stages. The relationship will go through cycles lasting maybe hours, days, months or even years.

Tension phase: The relationship may be strained as tension builds between the couple. The problems may be because of behaviors by one or the other of the couple, or they may build due to outside stressors such as financial problems, work problems, or problems with children or other family members. There may be verbal, emotional or mental abuse during this time. There may even be some minor physical abuse. There may be attempts made by the member who is typically abused to placate the other partner. Many partners who have gone through this have described it as walking on eggshells and hoping they won’t break. They will try to do almost anything to keep the other partner from getting upset. Yet, no matter how much they give in, or give up the explosion is almost inevitable.

Battery: The tension will continue to escalate until a battering incident occurs. Then a triggering incident will occur. Often the abuser will relate this to some behavior of the victim, but often the actual trigger may be a frustration from an outside source or due to some internal conflict of the abuser. In other words, the abuser may look for something to get angry over. Very occasionally, the victim may in feeling the buildup of tension, and knowing the incident is inevitable and knowing that after the battering period is coming and that the ‘honeymoon’ period will follow, the woman may actually instigate the battering period either conciously or unconciously.

The battering period is worse than in the tension phase, and can become quite serious, with a possiblity of severe injuries or death occurring. This is often where there will seemingly uncontrollable rage, and will continue until the abuser him/herself stops it. (In other words, they can control it.)

The ‘honeymoon phase: Often this is where the abuser may feel the victim is contrite enough, or they are fearful enough, that they will make what appears to be very sincere apologies, excuses, and/or promises that it won’t happen again, and sometimes even give special ”treats”. Planning special family events, giving gifts, taking them out to a special dinner, and being extra nice may occur.  

Despite the promises, hours, days, weeks, months or even years later- it will happen again.  And incidents of violence tend to escalate with each occurance.

actabuse.com

Reportedly on Christmas Eve 2005, Wendell Jerome Herman Rogers II, 33,  went to a Christmas party and came home late.

Then on Christmas morning he and his wife got into an argument that evidently escalated in front of their 2children. Allegedly the wife attempted to call for assistance, and Rogers tried to stop her.

Rogers was charged with family violence battery and obstructing and hindering a person making an emergency assistance call.

Rogers was in court on the charges recently. And the judge had words for him: “Basically you were hung over and didn’t want to be involved in some activities your wife planned,” “You acted up and ruined Christmas, so this year you’re going to make it up to them.” (emphasis mine).

The judge ordered a 12 month sentence, suspended until he completed an anger management program. A $1000 fine.

And he ordered Rogers to take his family to an expensive dinner at a restaurant for Christmas this year. He has until Jan. 5 to submit a reciept from the dinner to the court.

According to the defense attorney, Rogers agreed that he “misbehaved” and readily accepted the sentence. And the dinner for the family of four could cost Rogers up to $300.

msnbc.com                                                       wbstv.com

Let’s see. An excuse (hangover), avowal of wrong (he “misbehaved”, and special treat (expensive dinner). Is it just me or does this bear a strong resemblance to the “Honeymoon Cycle of Abuse”?

Often I am a fan of non-traditional methods of sentencing as long as the sentence is meant to teach or correct a wrong. And as long as the sentence fits the crime. So let’s take a look at the sentence.

A fine is certainly appropriate, as is anger management course. I am not really clear on the suspended sentence- if he completes the anger management course and takes his family out to dinner, does that mean he won’t serve any jail time for his crime? He doesn’t have a criminal history, but if the family has reconciled, then he certainly will be in close proximation to the same circumstances again. (Something like giving a drug user a suspended sentence and sending them to a drug house after they complete rehab).

And an expensive dinner is to “make up for” trauma inflicted on the wife, and the trauma on the children who witnessed it. The dinner is supposed to “make up for” a Christmas spent in tears.

And let’s look at the message he gives to domestic violence abusers. If you commit abuse, then you must pay for it by giving special treats to the family. For a first offense it is an expensive dinner, and wonder for the second offense- can they just add a box of candy, or would jewelry be more appropriate? Maybe for the 3 rd offense a family vacation might “make up for it”.

Now the man has been ordered to take his family out to dinner (hopefully the judge was not so insensitive as to order this on a couple who had not reconciled), but what message does that send to the victims? So you got knocked around a little- but look what you get for it? Wasn’t it worth it?

And by giving that sentence to Rogers, he was in effect sentencing the family also. What if a member of the family should decline to go to the dinner? Would they be in contempt of court? Or will the family force them to attend?

A Thank You goes out to Trisha for the tip on this one.

And MagZ is blogging on this one on Short Sighted  and Southern Sass.

Accident???

Police were called to two separate scenes today, both scenes possibly related by the first incident.

They were called to a home at 5:30 am for a domestic dispute and found a 32 year old woman with stab wounds to her chest and arms. The woman’s four children were in the home and reportedly witnessed the stabbing. They told police that she had been stabbed by her boyfriend Ronnie Edward Taylor, 41. According to what the children told authorities,  Taylor had said his intentions were to kill the victim then himself. The woman was transported to the hospital where she had surgery on her wounds. When police arrived, Taylor had fled the scene.

Police were also called to the scene of an auto accident. Allegedly Ronnie Taylor was traveling south and swerved into the northbound lane causing a headon crash with a pickup truck. Taylor was pronounced dead at the scene. Police say the crash may have been intentional.

The other truck that was struck, flipped several times, and the driver was ejected. The driver was transported to the hospital by helicoptor. Taylor was pronounced dead at the scene.

newsadvance.com                                         wdbj7.com

I did not see any reports on the condition of the stabbing victim, or on the other driver. Also no information on the children in the home, though there is no mention of the children being physically harmed.

And as usual, my thoughts go the fact that domestic violence is so often thought of as a couple’s problem. It may start with an argument between a couple, but never the less it is a crime. And too many times it reaches out and touches people other than the couple.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 41 other followers